Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Douglas Dunn <djdunn.safety@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:30:18
Message-Id: CAM3ZnqpK6HaqUNg5ar8X4_XVS2B6Qm8hQbynFaC_BJ4YtCtu3g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted by Douglas Dunn
1 To expand as i confused myself i meant that the appointment of a new devrel
2 lead should be required to at least be confirmed by the council
3 On Jun 20, 2013 7:25 AM, "Douglas Dunn" <djdunn.safety@×××××.com> wrote:
4
5 > In my opinion the devrel project lead or perhaps have 3 leads but should
6 > at least be confirmed by the council, if that can happen and the lead and
7 > or leads can make sure that the other devrel members are upholding the
8 > intent of the coc. It doesn't take a law degree to enforce the coc, maybe
9 > give individual devrel members the authority to give temporary punishments,
10 > but i think anything permanent should go to the council to at least confirm
11 > devrels suggestion of a permanent punishment.
12 >
13 > But imo if the lead of devrel needs confirmed by the council, and the
14 > council has the power to remove the lead, and the final appeal goes to the
15 > council, i dont see much room for the possibility of abuse by devrel.
16 >