1 |
To expand as i confused myself i meant that the appointment of a new devrel |
2 |
lead should be required to at least be confirmed by the council |
3 |
On Jun 20, 2013 7:25 AM, "Douglas Dunn" <djdunn.safety@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> In my opinion the devrel project lead or perhaps have 3 leads but should |
6 |
> at least be confirmed by the council, if that can happen and the lead and |
7 |
> or leads can make sure that the other devrel members are upholding the |
8 |
> intent of the coc. It doesn't take a law degree to enforce the coc, maybe |
9 |
> give individual devrel members the authority to give temporary punishments, |
10 |
> but i think anything permanent should go to the council to at least confirm |
11 |
> devrels suggestion of a permanent punishment. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> But imo if the lead of devrel needs confirmed by the council, and the |
14 |
> council has the power to remove the lead, and the final appeal goes to the |
15 |
> council, i dont see much room for the possibility of abuse by devrel. |
16 |
> |