| 1 |
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:25:35 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Now, why does every package supposedly need systemd@ as co-maintainer? |
| 5 |
> I don't think it's usually hard to see that a particular bug report is |
| 6 |
> relevant to systemd and reassign/CC. Even bug wranglers can CC systemd |
| 7 |
> if anything related to systemd is involved. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Wait. Stop. Part of the point of the bug-wranglers project was to have |
| 10 |
more people participate. One way of making that possible was to do away |
| 11 |
with all the petty special cases. Bugs are assigned/CC'd according to |
| 12 |
metadata.xml / repositories.xml / herds.xml (and anyone else added is |
| 13 |
up to the bug-wrangler's disgression) so please do not count on this. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If you want to ensure systemd@ is CC'd, then add it to metadata.xml, or |
| 16 |
try to create an environment where everybody is plain happy about |
| 17 |
CC'ing systemd@ themselves (or anyone else they think might help |
| 18 |
resolve a bug). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
jer |
Archives