| 1 |
On 09-08-2011 15:20:59 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 20:22 Tue 09 Aug , Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 09-08-2011 13:15:01 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > If/when we switch to git, we might want to reconsider that, since |
| 5 |
> > > all the handwritten messages will be old, largely irrelevant history |
| 6 |
> > > by then. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I don't follow your reasoning here. All messages that are old today, |
| 9 |
> > are also old when we switch to git. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Right. But the messages written last week are the ones I'm talking |
| 12 |
> about. They aren't old yet, but (almost) nobody's gonna care about them |
| 13 |
> six months from now. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
ok, the starting point was that we can generate ChangeLogs using CVS |
| 16 |
today, we don't need to wait for git. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 21 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives