Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:26:30
Message-Id: 20110809202606.GD1578@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) by Donnie Berkholz
On 09-08-2011 15:20:59 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 20:22 Tue 09 Aug , Fabian Groffen wrote: > > On 09-08-2011 13:15:01 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > If/when we switch to git, we might want to reconsider that, since > > > all the handwritten messages will be old, largely irrelevant history > > > by then. > > > > I don't follow your reasoning here. All messages that are old today, > > are also old when we switch to git. > > Right. But the messages written last week are the ones I'm talking > about. They aren't old yet, but (almost) nobody's gonna care about them > six months from now.
ok, the starting point was that we can generate ChangeLogs using CVS today, we don't need to wait for git. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level