Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: A proposal to get out of this mess
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:57:32
Message-Id: b41005390801191057ge80e4d1o9f8760a60c01ca7e@mail.gmail.com
Gah, wrong sender address...why can't gmail just noticed that my
gentoo.org address was in the thread before; I have no idea...

On 1/19/08, Alec Warner <antarus@×××××××××××.com> wrote:
> On 1/19/08, Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: > > Dominik Riva wrote: > > > > > On Jan 15, 2008 2:15 PM, Wulf C. Krueger <philantrop@g.o> wrote: > > > > > >> Please explain why I should care about the Gentoo Foundation in your > > >> opinion. > > > > > > Maybe because it is a the part of Gentoo was designed to holds Gentoo's > > > assets? Things like the logo, servers, name, ... oh and don't forget the > > > money - all rather unimportant things, right? > > > > > Well I for one would like the option of never reincorporating to be > > discussed. The only thing that would matter is the trademark/brand. Infra > > seems to be owned by others in any case, people and organisations who use > > Gentoo as part of their work and thus have a vested interest in it > > continuing. > > We have existing relationships we would like to maintain and that > requires having a legal entity to maintian them. Having that entity > be a single individual leads us with a SPOF; hence the time currently > being spent to re-instate the foundation. > > -Alec >
-- gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list