1 |
On 03-08-2011 02:26:44 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
2 |
> > I think yes, if the council regarding GLEP39 thinks A, but the dev |
3 |
> > population B, then it is unlikely the council will vote for B. |
4 |
> > However, the dev population should vote for other council members |
5 |
> > that do support B for the next term in that case. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > You have all rights of course to try and persuade the council members |
8 |
> > to change their minds and vote for B. Probably good argumentation |
9 |
> > will help there. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I strongly disagree on this since I support that any change to GLEP39 |
12 |
> will require a global dev vote, which means that even if the council |
13 |
> starts a discussion and guides the process for GLEP39 reform, in the end |
14 |
> it will fall to the full developer community to approve it or not. |
15 |
> I do think that the council should have an active role in GLEP39 reform |
16 |
> and that it's natural for the council to "lead" on this process. If |
17 |
> we're able to get this moving forward, I would be open to having the |
18 |
> council nominate a person or committee to spearhead the process. |
19 |
|
20 |
I don't see how the both of us disagree here. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Fabian Groffen |
25 |
Gentoo on a different level |