Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:14:10
Message-Id: 20110803081347.GB81662@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
On 03-08-2011 02:26:44 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> > I think yes, if the council regarding GLEP39 thinks A, but the dev > > population B, then it is unlikely the council will vote for B. > > However, the dev population should vote for other council members > > that do support B for the next term in that case. > > > > You have all rights of course to try and persuade the council members > > to change their minds and vote for B. Probably good argumentation > > will help there. > > I strongly disagree on this since I support that any change to GLEP39 > will require a global dev vote, which means that even if the council > starts a discussion and guides the process for GLEP39 reform, in the end > it will fall to the full developer community to approve it or not. > I do think that the council should have an active role in GLEP39 reform > and that it's natural for the council to "lead" on this process. If > we're able to get this moving forward, I would be open to having the > council nominate a person or committee to spearhead the process.
I don't see how the both of us disagree here. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level