| 1 |
Am Montag, 9. April 2018, 02:11:19 CEST schrieb zlg: |
| 2 |
> > We request that the Gentoo Council and the Board of Trustees of the |
| 3 |
> > Gentoo |
| 4 |
> > Foundation affirm Gentoo's metastructure GLEP 39 as the governing |
| 5 |
> > principle |
| 6 |
> > of the Gentoo Linux developer community. In particular, both acknowledge |
| 7 |
> > the split between |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > - the Gentoo Council, which is responsible for the Gentoo Linux |
| 10 |
> > developer |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > community, its user base and all technical decisions, |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > - and the Gentoo Foundation, whose role is to hold Gentoo's assets |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > (such as trademarks and server infrastructure) and support the |
| 17 |
> > developer |
| 18 |
> > and user community. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[snip] |
| 21 |
> To the Council: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> What makes you accountable to this community? Why should we trust or |
| 24 |
> respect you when you have nothing on the line except a title? What |
| 25 |
> happens next if these affirmations are made? What's your angle, your |
| 26 |
> real motivation? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
This proposal describes precisely |
| 30 |
* how I was taught "Gentoo works" for my quizzes sometime around 2010 |
| 31 |
* how the cooperation and separation of responsibilities between council and |
| 32 |
foundation worked for the years since then |
| 33 |
* and what was the basis of understanding for council and trustees elections |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Thus, we are asking for an affirmation of the status quo, nothing else. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 40 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 41 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 42 |
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) |
Archives