Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Preparations Council meeting 2011-08-09
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 08:12:15
Message-Id: 4E37B131.2070500@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Preparations Council meeting 2011-08-09 by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/02/2011 12:10 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 01-08-2011 20:46, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 08/01/2011 08:32 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >>> On 01-08-2011 20:16:34 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: >>>>> Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can >>>>> and who can't get a cloak? This is probably going to be the >>>>> GLEP that Petteri refers to. Does it make sense to vote for >>>>> this topic without that GLEP in place? >>>>> >>>> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request. >>>> Petteri suggested to have the council vote and transfer the >>>> responsibility to devrel, which in accordance will include this >>>> in a new GLEP defining the devrel policy just like then one for >>>> QA. > >>> Ok, thanks. Am I correct by summarising this point as simply a vote >>> for transferring the cloak responsibility to devrel? > > >> Yes I think this is pretty much the gist. > > No, I'm sorry but that's not the point. > First, these users issues need to be moved to "community relations", the > project I and Petteri have been talking about to unite DevRel and UserRel. > In any case, the 2 issues at stake here are: > > 1. Do we want / support gentoo/user cloaks or not? If so, what is needed > for anyone to get them.
Based on the thread I used as a reference on the original e-mail nobody raised any objections so I assumed that "Yes we want them".
> 2. What should gentoo/contributor cloaks mean? Should they be reserved > to ATs/HTs/other official project members? How can they be requested / > validated? >
This does not look like a council issue. It fits perfectly to the "community relations" you mentioned before. That's why I said that the council has to transfer the responsibility to the one of the two *Rel projects. - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJON7ExAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCNuwP/2HfY0kQSnU1WB2VYoZu65Wh PTVZJHnJa7n2QfdlRJdP/XLdZduMX8cpSy7oa7BwlgMdLtZykjVcFvA0PUWOLFtk EBCDnT1mAONixuaoj6ksi1aUvVso7xp0uVb54QpoJL6wzPtEzLJLczs4sQBC/rTK NGn42Lt6rSCBjelMoJKTHkrjKGcyjH8fRd7trVSQmJ1Om7X5d08njuNJdbDRShj0 +ezlvTrW64ERc0w56hpGR+SzgRnawbTAxa/N6lPnsv+J5ZU0tkLtWPzWlj4r+niT nYfj6AncaVBYYcs9RUVpxuQdot+DPUf3wY3bVQGXUop5xHtGZeqLQr8q8juEU9a9 bf+bYK4XP+abC2TG32d+4uXKS801a2qu3+8lO3IANFYTTbmQWcHSzG4RXBFXM6rl OpjHWMmHALWVr9jhEmJgnE6L+KFsSQcyp6keGH+v1S8o1RW8vwitcDAD46gkb/OK lrjv1PwhUSN3xDpNn9Jc+P50LeUkzpZymKz9iwaija1rqYmQ9JmWAAJftSIZhU6y lsYmK7FD5RpcGQuKjDyYijPiCtnptMRG1Xar5fIQMqzyg7eMbwolSKeVC6G3Mqgg npVLBEQn4VVEj/pcn3MD5gshyfZwBHAQ/3UAX4OYuvcnVwTN/CCUfUHZSwzxkvfS gWfU06VtSj9dbcBkC7KY =zlZH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----