1 |
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:03:30 -0500 |
2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 07:25:55AM -0400, Douglas Dunn wrote: |
5 |
> > In my opinion the devrel project lead or perhaps have 3 leads but |
6 |
> > should at least be confirmed by the council, if that can happen and |
7 |
> > the lead and or leads can make sure that the other devrel members |
8 |
> > are upholding the intent of the coc. It doesn't take a law degree |
9 |
> > to enforce the coc, maybe give individual devrel members the |
10 |
> > authority to give temporary punishments, but i think anything |
11 |
> > permanent should go to the council to at least confirm devrels |
12 |
> > suggestion of a permanent punishment. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> If the council has to approve a major action devrel takes against a |
15 |
> developer, there is no point in that developer appealing to the |
16 |
> council. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> > But imo if the lead of devrel needs confirmed by the council, and |
19 |
> > the council has the power to remove the lead, and the final appeal |
20 |
> > goes to the council, i dont see much room for the possibility of |
21 |
> > abuse by devrel. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I don't see why the council couldn't remove the devrel lead if they |
24 |
> felt it necessary. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Here are some thoughts I have wrt this situation: |
27 |
> |
28 |
> 1. The QA and Devrel projects are directly accountable to the council. |
29 |
> This protects against abuse of power since the council can remove |
30 |
> people from these projects if they determine that power is being |
31 |
> abused. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> 2. The leads of these projects should be selected by the projects like |
34 |
> any other project, but confirmed by the council. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> 3. Since the leads are confirmed by the council, I don't think it is |
37 |
> necessary for them to go back to the council for approval for actions |
38 |
> they take. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> 4. Both of these projects require unique skill sets that most |
41 |
> developers may not have, so I don't think electing members of these |
42 |
> projects is a good idea. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> 5. Any actions these projects take can be appealed to the council |
45 |
> (This follows from point 1). |
46 |
> |
47 |
> Thoughts? |
48 |
|
49 |
+1 |