| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:58:15 +0000 |
| 3 |
> George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:18:08 +0100 |
| 6 |
>>> "Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> On Dec 15, 2007 5:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 8 |
>>>> <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>>> Incorrect. The Council has stated that once PMS has been accepted |
| 10 |
>>>>> [...] |
| 11 |
>>>> Which has yet to happen. |
| 12 |
>>> Well no. But that doesn't stop what Roy said from being utter |
| 13 |
>>> nonsense. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>> But which would hold more weight? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Huh? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
ok, lets put it in easy language... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If a package manager that Gentoo uses happens to use ebuilds, right? And |
| 22 |
the main developer of another package manager thinks that it shouldn't |
| 23 |
be used for that reason then it would be logical to never use that PM |
| 24 |
for PACKAGE MANAGEMENT. Right? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Actually, that would give pretty much anything weight over said PM. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-project@g.o mailing list |
Archives