1 |
Alexis Ballier schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I would add maximum amounts of time everywhere here: For the QA ban |
4 |
> because this effectively still leaves room for "age of the universe" |
5 |
> long bans and a slightly shorter one for the comrel response to ensure |
6 |
> no important ban is missed due to people being on vacations. |
7 |
|
8 |
If we agree that QA bans are emergency powers *only* to avert breakage |
9 |
reaching users, and/or causing unreasonable amounts of work for other |
10 |
developers to undo, then that would implicitly limit the time of a ban to |
11 |
whenever the next ComRel/Council meeting can discuss this incident. |
12 |
|
13 |
Afterwards it will either be lifted or turned into a ComRel ban. |
14 |
|
15 |
> Depending on that maximum, council appeal may not be needed because |
16 |
> it'd take longer than the ban length anyway. |
17 |
|
18 |
I think that ComRel review of the QA emergency decision should be the default |
19 |
unless the disciplinary action has expired or was lifted in the meantime. |
20 |
|
21 |
But even so, if some QA decision is questionable, bringing it before Council |
22 |
is good irrespective of whether it is a past or current matter. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Best regards, |
26 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |