1 |
On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 22:22 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 09:07:11PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > On 2021-05-01 17:14, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
6 |
> > > There's rumors going around that Agostino's tinderbox basically |
7 |
> > > already burned through our entire 2021 AWS Open Source credit budget |
8 |
> > > and has overdrawn it significantly. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > Independent of whether this rumor is true or not, I would like to |
11 |
> > > discuss |
12 |
> > > * how we can avoid such a situation in the future, |
13 |
> > > * and how we can fairly handle the distribution of limited infra |
14 |
> > > resources that may end up costing us money |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Is this really a topic for council? |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Isn't foundation an independent body and if someone requests funding |
19 |
> > from foundation and will get it approved... |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > Or in other words: Can council veto against funding requests the |
22 |
> > foundation received and wants to approve? |
23 |
> |
24 |
> The way I see it is, if the council wants funding for something they |
25 |
> can request it from the foundation, but I don't think they can direct |
26 |
> the foundation not to fund something someone else requests. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Also, given Antarus' response in the thread, I'm not sure there is |
29 |
> anything for council to discuss. |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
Does 'being not sure' authorize you to arbitrarily decide to skip agenda |
33 |
items from the community? |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Best regards, |
37 |
Michał Górny |