1 |
On Sun, 11 May 2014 21:06:13 +0300 |
2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> It should have been... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> "OK, nothing is broken here, nothing for qa@ to do, looks like |
7 |
> ssuominen did everything for us." |
8 |
|
9 |
That's exactly what I did; having him talk to you first, I did not |
10 |
state anything to be broken or that the QA team must do something. |
11 |
|
12 |
As to whether what you did is alright to the maintainer, that depends |
13 |
on your and the arch team's response; given you override both of them on |
14 |
a package that you don't maintain, I can't just make a bold claim that |
15 |
"did everything for us" to be OK. It really depends on the motives... |
16 |
|
17 |
> Instead if you insisted on mangling the issue and shoving the policies |
18 |
> up in the face, |
19 |
|
20 |
No, I quoted the documentation for the case at hand. |
21 |
|
22 |
> and when you were pointed out the major arches leads have given an |
23 |
> exception for stabilizing packages, you didn't apology for the waste |
24 |
> of time, instead, you continued with mangling the issue futher, |
25 |
> accomplishing nothing but wasting everyones valuable time. |
26 |
|
27 |
That exception does not apply to this case, I also get a whole backlog |
28 |
on IRC in return for my Comment #3; therefore, I continue to further |
29 |
clarify what is going on, because you were upset regarding kingtaco's rule. |
30 |
|
31 |
That rule is known to me as it has been told to me by hwoarang during |
32 |
my recruitment; you directly assumed me to not know that rule, as well |
33 |
as appear to use it in a context that the rule isn't applicable. |
34 |
|
35 |
I'm expecting apologies from you too, given the statements that I've |
36 |
quoted in the sub thread, it's a waste of valuable time to everyone |
37 |
involved, both you and me; so, I do apologize for trying to help out. |
38 |
|
39 |
You know me well enough to know that I'm not messing with your work, |
40 |
at least not intentionally; if you do see it, feel free to /query me. |
41 |
|
42 |
Please consider to apologize to me in return... |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
With kind regards, |
46 |
|
47 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
48 |
Gentoo Developer |
49 |
|
50 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
51 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
52 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |