| 1 |
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 12:36:16PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:12 PM Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > IMO Gentoo (and the members of its community) should be using this as |
| 4 |
> > an opportunity to tarnish Sony's reputation, not bend over backwards |
| 5 |
> > to cater to a random request of a company lawyer who seemingly isn't |
| 6 |
> > interested in actually discussing their policy. This isn't Sony |
| 7 |
> > contributing to open source, this is Sony interfering with what has |
| 8 |
> > basically been routine practice in the community for 15-20 years. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Absolutely unbelievable. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Sony is paying people to work on Gentoo. We should not use this as an |
| 13 |
> opportunity to tarnish their reputation or anyone else's for that |
| 14 |
> matter. What an absurd thing to even suggest. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Perhaps you should remove yourself from this conversation. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Rich, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regardless of anything that is said in this thread, I do not agree, as |
| 21 |
a council member, with the idea of the Gentoo community actively |
| 22 |
tarnishing anyone's reputation. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I have added the proctors to this email, because I think they should |
| 25 |
determine whether your behavior is a CoC violation. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
William |
Archives