1 |
As myself only, I want to add some info to this. |
2 |
|
3 |
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 01:07:39AM +0000, Roy Bamford wrote: |
4 |
> On 2020.12.11 21:23, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
5 |
> > Hi, |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > The topic has been discussed extensively in the past few weeks; The |
8 |
> > sad |
9 |
> > climax was last Tuesday. At this point I will not look back anymore. |
10 |
> > Maybe all of us could have done a better job but whataboutism doesn’t |
11 |
> > help anyone. Let's try to focus on a possible solution. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > To recall the problem: |
14 |
> > On November 7th, Gentoo forum member "Old School" named another human |
15 |
> > being a slut (https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8526392.html#8526392). |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > This is a violation of Gentoo's code of conduct where we explicit |
18 |
> > state |
19 |
> > that "posting messages that are deliberately hostile and insulting" |
20 |
> > are |
21 |
> > unacceptable behaviors |
22 |
> > (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Code_of_conduct). |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > This is not about free speech. Gentoo is primary a Linux distribution, |
25 |
> > not a discussion platform. This is about us who defined once how we |
26 |
> > want |
27 |
> > to treat each other in the Gentoo community and everyone participating |
28 |
> > must adhere to our code of conduct. It’s that simple. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > I expect that everyone in Gentoo, including forum moderators, agree on |
31 |
> > that. |
32 |
|
33 |
The free speech issue is only relevant in terms of government sensorship |
34 |
(at least in the US that's the case) |
35 |
it doesn't prevent a private organization from setting community guidelines and taking disciplinary action against people who don't follow them [1]. |
36 |
|
37 |
[1] https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ |
38 |
|
39 |
> I have a major concern with the concept of the council |
40 |
> deciding to close any part of the forum. Its like this ... |
41 |
> At present, Gentoo is a common carrier, like the mail. |
42 |
> The content of letters and parcels is of little concern to the |
43 |
> carrier. |
44 |
|
45 |
Common carrier status seems to apply to ISPs and Telecomm companies |
46 |
[2]. Gentoo is neither, so I have to disagree with your claim that is |
47 |
a common carrier. |
48 |
|
49 |
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_carrier |
50 |
|
51 |
William |