Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: ulm@g.o, rich0@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:08:57
Message-Id: 20181014170851.GA26234@linux1.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14 by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 05:53:03PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2 > >>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
3 >
4 > > If this is something to vote on in the meeting, lets have something we
5 > > can actually vote on before the meeting, please.
6 > > Can you come up with a wording of all this then that we can confidently
7 > > vote on, worded suitable for such, with the intentions clear in regards
8 > > to MUST/SHALL/SHOULD/MAY and whatnot? Maybe without referencing an
9 > > outside RFC to define what English words mean (or worse - using its
10 > > definitions without referencing it).
11 >
12 > How about this motion:
13 >
14 > The simplified form of the copyright attribution according to
15 > GLEP 76 [1], i.e., "Copyright YEARS Gentoo Authors", should be used
16 > for ebuilds and profile files in the Gentoo repository.
17
18 s/should be used/is preferred, but not required/
19
20 > Exceptionally, files carrying the long form of the copyright attribution
21 > ("Copyright YEARS MAIN-CONTRIBUTOR [OTHER-CONTRIBUTOR]... [and others]")
22 > can also be accepted, if there are valid reasons why the simplified
23 > attribution cannot be used.
24
25 Remove this entire paragraph.
26
27 As rich0 said, there is no legal reason to mandate anything about the
28 copyright header.
29
30 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies