1 |
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 05:53:03PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> >>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > If this is something to vote on in the meeting, lets have something we |
5 |
> > can actually vote on before the meeting, please. |
6 |
> > Can you come up with a wording of all this then that we can confidently |
7 |
> > vote on, worded suitable for such, with the intentions clear in regards |
8 |
> > to MUST/SHALL/SHOULD/MAY and whatnot? Maybe without referencing an |
9 |
> > outside RFC to define what English words mean (or worse - using its |
10 |
> > definitions without referencing it). |
11 |
> |
12 |
> How about this motion: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The simplified form of the copyright attribution according to |
15 |
> GLEP 76 [1], i.e., "Copyright YEARS Gentoo Authors", should be used |
16 |
> for ebuilds and profile files in the Gentoo repository. |
17 |
|
18 |
s/should be used/is preferred, but not required/ |
19 |
|
20 |
> Exceptionally, files carrying the long form of the copyright attribution |
21 |
> ("Copyright YEARS MAIN-CONTRIBUTOR [OTHER-CONTRIBUTOR]... [and others]") |
22 |
> can also be accepted, if there are valid reasons why the simplified |
23 |
> attribution cannot be used. |
24 |
|
25 |
Remove this entire paragraph. |
26 |
|
27 |
As rich0 said, there is no legal reason to mandate anything about the |
28 |
copyright header. |
29 |
|
30 |
William |