1 |
Rich Freeman schrieb: |
2 |
>>>> Suppose that the council decides to accept an appeal from comrel. Is it |
3 |
>>>> a conflict of interest for a member of the council who is also a member |
4 |
>>>> of comrel to vote in the appeal? If it isn't, it is at least a pretty |
5 |
>>>> strong perception that it is. |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>> Why? How? Exactly what sort of conflicting interest is supposed to be |
8 |
>>> present? |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> I think in Comrel vs. Council is not a conflict of interest, but rather |
11 |
>> throwing the appeals process off balance. Can you expect someone to neutrally |
12 |
>> review material and actions (question the authenticity of evidence, identify |
13 |
>> potential misconduct, etc.) that they themselves used to build the case |
14 |
>> against the reprimanded? |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I hope that Comrel does not consider it their main duty to build cases |
18 |
> against community members. They're supposed to investigate, mediate, |
19 |
> and take action if necessary. They aren't prosecutors. |
20 |
|
21 |
(I'm taking this back to -project where it belongs) |
22 |
|
23 |
But typically only Comrel actions can be appealed. Investigations or |
24 |
mediation not. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
Best regards, |
28 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |