Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Bad license and attribution by ChromiumOS and CoreOS
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:26:37
Message-Id: CAGfcS_n4A26UTuJwC-+zay+MjABVBHXeg-AcTE1gVaqbH-VkfA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Bad license and attribution by ChromiumOS and CoreOS by Andrew Savchenko
1 On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:41:11 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 >> While we agree that the README can be misleading, that was certainly not the
4 >> point and has been updated:
5 >> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/overlays/portage-stable/+/master/README
6 >
7 > Good. But github repo is still not fixed:
8 > https://github.com/coreos/portage-stable
9 >
10
11 That is CoreOS, not ChromiumOS. We should ping them about this
12 separately. Since they're based on ChromiumOS I doubt they'll fuss
13 much over adopting the new README.
14
15 I posted this on their -dev "list":
16 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/coreos-dev/goLG-5r8m1s
17
18 --
19 Rich

Replies