1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
I also don't understand what you expect from metrics. |
4 |
|
5 |
Imagine the following metrics for January: |
6 |
|
7 |
> - number of bugs received: 22 |
8 |
> - number of bugs pending: 10 |
9 |
> - number of bugs resolved by actions: 2 |
10 |
> - number of bugs closed without action: 10 |
11 |
> |
12 |
> - number of mediation requests received: 0 |
13 |
> - number of mediation requests resolved: 0 |
14 |
> - number of mediation requests escalated to bugs: 0 |
15 |
> - number of mediation requests dismissed without action: 0 |
16 |
|
17 |
Now what? :-) |
18 |
|
19 |
These numbers have no real meaning. Without knowing why 10 bugs are |
20 |
pending you don't know if ComRel people are slackers or if bugs were |
21 |
just filed in the last day(s) of January. |
22 |
|
23 |
Without knowing details nobody can answer if ComRel people are slackers, |
24 |
acting like the US supreme court or if it was OK to close 10 bugs |
25 |
without any action. |
26 |
|
27 |
The thing is, people *will* read *something* into these numbers which |
28 |
can only go wrong and won't help us. For me, it's the same like the |
29 |
transparency reports from Google, Facebook, Twitter: The number of |
30 |
requests is increasing each year. Is that happening because authorities |
31 |
around the world are more and more persecuting their citizen? Or is it |
32 |
just because more and more authorities gained access to that instrument |
33 |
which can now be used using some kind of standards? How does everything |
34 |
correlate to service usage at all? You don't know but you can use such |
35 |
reports to generate whatever message you like to send out. In the end, |
36 |
these transparency reports are just some kind of show to keep people |
37 |
quiet (Look, we do something!). |
38 |
|
39 |
If we are interested in transparency, how about the following 'radical' |
40 |
change: Let's make bugs *public*, at least for project members. In this |
41 |
way, each project member can form their own view/opinion based on real |
42 |
facts. |
43 |
|
44 |
Maybe not from the beginning like some court hearings (trials) aren't |
45 |
public as well. But because ComRel is speaking 'in the name of the |
46 |
project', bugs should become accessible at least for project members |
47 |
when ComRel's job is done like court decision are usually published. |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Regards, |
52 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
53 |
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |