1 |
On 10/01/2013 07:22 PM, hasufell wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/01/2013 07:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
3 |
>> On 10/01/2013 06:27 PM, hasufell wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 10/01/2013 03:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>>> That isn't to say that I won't fairly evaluate appeals, but I'm |
7 |
>>>> not going to second-guess every little temporary list ban. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> No one here dares to ban long-term trolls from the list. They |
11 |
>>> are tolerated. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
> |
14 |
>> This contributes nothing to the discussion does it? From what I |
15 |
>> can tell, it's you who are trolling right now and tries to derail |
16 |
>> the discussion. The ComRel was formed only a week ago and no trolls |
17 |
>> have appeared since then. Or do you just want us to start banning |
18 |
>> people to prove that we are willing to do it? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> No, I'm just explaining my view on the usefulness of shaping CoC |
22 |
> wording and stating that our MLs are practically not moderated. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> That is not trolling. So yes, it is yet to prove that something has |
25 |
> actually changed. Do you want me to open a new thread for this comment? |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
We do not need to prove anything to anyone. The fact that *you* can't |
29 |
see ComRel operating, it does not mean we are idling. The mailing lists |
30 |
are not practically moderated because we assumed that people are capable |
31 |
to have professional discussions. Clearly we were wrong and I already |
32 |
announced our intention to changed that. Like I said, that e-mail was |
33 |
send only a week ago and since then we haven't seen any problem. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Regards, |
37 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
38 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |