1 |
On 15.07.2011 15:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> On 20:39 Thu 14 Jul , Petteri Räty wrote: |
3 |
>> On 14.07.2011 20:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Thursday 14 of July 2011 20:13:55 Petteri Räty wrote: |
5 |
>>>> Keeping a list and periodically going through it seems fine to me. Are |
6 |
>>>> you or someone else interested in joining devrel to get this implemented |
7 |
>>>> and maintained? The policy should probably be written as a GLEP and I |
8 |
>>>> can help with that but until GSoC is over I am pretty much fully booked |
9 |
>>>> for Gentoo time so I would like to avoid championing it at this point. |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> Regards, |
12 |
>>>> Petteri |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> Not interested in joining devrel, sorry, but I could start writing the GLEP. |
15 |
>>> Is there an existing one about cloaks that we could improve, or start from |
16 |
>>> scratch? |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> I am not aware of any of the existing GLEPs covering the matter so from |
19 |
>> scratch is probably required. For the GLEP I think it's enough if we |
20 |
>> keep things simple and just list the conditions for getting and keeping |
21 |
>> each type of cloak and the process of getting requesting a cloak. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Why should this be a GLEP? Seems like it should be covered by either |
24 |
> devrel or userrel, no need for the council to get involved as it's not a |
25 |
> global issue. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
I think cloaks are a project wide issue. If you think it's best for |
29 |
devrel to handle it on our own then I suggest we have a council vote |
30 |
saying that or I can try to get a GLEP for devrel done and include it in |
31 |
there for responsibilities. |
32 |
|
33 |
Regards, |
34 |
Petteri |