Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] PMS | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:49:14 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20071215164830.154e8016@blueyonder.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] PMS by Roy Bamford |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:30:48 +0000 |
| 2 | Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > The offical package manager is portage. If another package manager |
| 4 | > does something different to portage - even if it fixes a bug in |
| 5 | > portage, by definition, its not compliant. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Incorrect. The Council has stated that once PMS has been accepted, any |
| 8 | PMS compliant package manager is acceptable, and any package manager |
| 9 | deviating from PMS is buggy. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] PMS | Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> |