From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] PMS | ||
Date: | Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:49:14 | ||
Message-Id: | 20071215164830.154e8016@blueyonder.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] PMS by Roy Bamford |
1 | On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:30:48 +0000 |
2 | Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > The offical package manager is portage. If another package manager |
4 | > does something different to portage - even if it fixes a bug in |
5 | > portage, by definition, its not compliant. |
6 | |
7 | Incorrect. The Council has stated that once PMS has been accepted, any |
8 | PMS compliant package manager is acceptable, and any package manager |
9 | deviating from PMS is buggy. |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-project] PMS | Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> |