1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Hey guys, |
5 |
|
6 |
I'd like to discuss a topic that I know much people will use for |
7 |
trolling/flaming or similar. If you feel like this - get you a weapon |
8 |
and cool down, but please do not answer :) |
9 |
|
10 |
I start this discussion as I'm inspired by some posts at drobbin's blog. |
11 |
|
12 |
The first thing: |
13 |
What is the actual (official) attitude towards Sabayon? |
14 |
|
15 |
If it is as I think it is (negative) - why is it like this? Why isn't |
16 |
Sabayon treated as an official "child project"? Why is support denied |
17 |
for Sabayon Users? - I know that they have a global ~$ARCH and some |
18 |
not-so-nice hacks ;), but this shouldn't be a reason, as problems |
19 |
related to this shouldn't be the major part... |
20 |
|
21 |
I want just to propose, that the devs should be more open for Sabayon - |
22 |
and see it as a source of ideas and software. If lxnay will finish |
23 |
Entropy (and it helds what it is supposed ;)) - it will add a feature |
24 |
that is often asked for and always declined as "not possible". (And |
25 |
there may be other stuff ...) |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
Hmm ... I had several other thoughts but forgot them during the day :/. |
29 |
So again: Only serious, constructive answers :) |
30 |
|
31 |
- -- Nec |
32 |
|
33 |
P.S.: Nope - I'm not a Sabayon User :) |
34 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
35 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) |
36 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
37 |
|
38 |
iD8DBQFGsVwP4UOg/zhYFuARAgJ7AJ4ly6n/vGhKxFby7HpvFdNyEGw96ACdF6VV |
39 |
kHM9MZIKcpQrtDS6zb37IGs= |
40 |
=JwcP |
41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-project@g.o mailing list |