| 1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01-08-2011 21:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 3 |
>> gentoo-dev, -project, -dev-announce ... this would mean that we |
| 4 |
>> split discussions between three mailing lists at least. (Probably |
| 5 |
>> more, for example PMS/EAPI related stuff should be discussed on |
| 6 |
>> gentoo-pms then.) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
>> That's too complicated for my simple mind. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Unfortunately you can't prevent it. You won't be able to force |
| 11 |
> people to use gentoo-council to discuss any technical issues that |
| 12 |
> have always been discussed on the gentoo-dev ml because it's simpler |
| 13 |
> for the council members. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Technical discussions started on -dev could stay there, of course. |
| 16 |
Generally, trying to move a thread from one mailing list to another |
| 17 |
won't work (and only lead to a discussion split between both lists). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The point is that the current scheme does not really work and we end |
| 20 |
up discussing technical issues on -project where they are off-topic. |
| 21 |
Two examples from today are the sub-threads about "signed commits" [1] |
| 22 |
and "optional runtime dependencies" [2]. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Ulrich |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
[1] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_cb85cb70b49c12b6194f972dbc7fbcdb.xml> |
| 27 |
[2] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_5e6199cb16f1af820200fa4bcebbf08d.xml> |
Archives