Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com>
To:
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-project] Reply to setting Was: Improving developer/user communication]
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 06:39:26
Message-Id: 46A1AA10.1060305@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-project] Reply to setting Was: Improving developer/user communication] by Robert Buchholz
Robert Buchholz wrote:
> On Saturday, 21. July 2007 02:37, Dale wrote: >> Is it just me or is the reply to function not working on this list >> yet? When I hit reply to, it appears that it is not going to the >> list but to the person that sent the message I am replying too. >> >> Oh, I did this as a forward since asking just George may not do any >> good. Sorry if this messes up the headers or something. > > This list does not have "reply to munging" enabled, meaning the Reply-To > will not be set to the list address for you. > > On some reasons why that often is a good idea, read the > article "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful" [1]. > > Please use the "Reply to all" or "Reply to list" features of your > mailer, they all have either of those if not both. Please do not use > forwarding. > > Also, you could write some procmail rule (if applicable) to reset the > Reply-To for your incoming mail, see [2] for details. > > -R. > > > [1] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > [2] > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/reply-to.xml#doc_chap1_sect3
Oh dear, I just realised that. I'll go through my sent emails and re-post them to the list. Sorry. I don't think any have gone to just the individuals though but i'll check. G -- gentoo-project@g.o mailing list