1 |
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:37:57 +0400 |
2 |
Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hello. While it is not tool late, could you guys reconsider top-down |
5 |
> localization approach decided on last meeting[1]? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> There are language specific things that will be be kept out of wiki |
8 |
> only due to this policy. For example I don't see any reason to write |
9 |
> article about use of Russian cryptography algorithms in Gentoo in any |
10 |
> language but Russian. There is no need to have this article in |
11 |
> English since nobody will read it. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
Are you sure that no non-russian will read it? |
15 |
|
16 |
> Another reason - reality is that most of people do not know English |
17 |
> language. Why do you want to stop them from contributing? For quality |
18 |
> control - we have translator teams or there are developers who know |
19 |
> the language in question. Just find editors for every supported |
20 |
> language and let them do quality control. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> [1] http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_Wiki:Meetings/2011-10-17 (see |
23 |
> Log) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> WBR, |
27 |
> -- |
28 |
> Peter. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
IMHO it's simple. |
33 |
|
34 |
I think it is ok to expect that "everybody" can read and/or write |
35 |
English, at least partially. :) |
36 |
|
37 |
As a3li already mentioned in the meeting log: English is the world |
38 |
language, almost everything in the Open Source world is written in |
39 |
English, documentation, comments and so on. |
40 |
|
41 |
So I guess there are *much* more people who can read/write English but |
42 |
*not* Russian, French or whatever else. |
43 |
|
44 |
I find it quite unacceptable to write documentations, "source |
45 |
code"/comments and so on in French, German, ... only. You'd need |
46 |
somebody who knows both languages first to translate it into English so |
47 |
that "everybody" can read it. |
48 |
It is much easier if we say that we need at least the initial article in |
49 |
English only/first because there are much more people who may or may |
50 |
not take care of it and keep it up2date. |
51 |
|
52 |
I also think that English articles are often more up2date because of |
53 |
the reason(s) mentioned above, simple example: man-pages-$LANG. |
54 |
|
55 |
I don't know about other languages but at least for English/German it |
56 |
applies. *I* even try to avoid German docs because of that and often |
57 |
they're also misleading or "completely" wrong, not enough people who |
58 |
review it because they can't read it... |
59 |
|
60 |
So you *basically* need English knowledge/basics to install and use |
61 |
Gentoo/Linux, not everything is translated and mostly not even fully. |
62 |
Commands, Sources, ... almost all "English". You even need (basically) |
63 |
English to learn C or other programming/script languages - Why would |
64 |
you want to write docs, comments or even the help messages in your |
65 |
native language then? |
66 |
|
67 |
That just sucks if there is nothing in English and you need to read |
68 |
those comments and so on. It's just shitty. |
69 |
|
70 |
We also use English for our Mailinglists, IRC, Forums, Bugzilla and so |
71 |
on, why? Because everybody can read it. |
72 |
|
73 |
Another *bad* example are translated error messages. |
74 |
Do you like to get bug reports with German error logs? |
75 |
|
76 |
To me it's the same as with the Wiki, that is *my* opinion. |
77 |
|
78 |
-- |
79 |
Regards, |
80 |
Christian Ruppert |
81 |
Role: Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure |
82 |
member Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7C84 B274 6C59 F243 5EAB 0C62 B427 ABC8 |