| 1 |
W dniu śro, 30.08.2017 o godzinie 14∶08 +0200, użytkownik Kristian |
| 2 |
Fiskerstrand napisał: |
| 3 |
> On 08/30/2017 01:59 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > I request the Council to approve a PMS change, namely to ban empty |
| 7 |
> > > dependency groups like "|| ( )" or "foo? ( )". |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I retract this. It appears to be controversial, which is bad for a |
| 10 |
> > retroactive change. (And IMHO it is an obscure corner case anyway.) |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> It might still be a good idea to discuss the matter, although I agree it |
| 14 |
> likely is better to discuss it more broadly before it reaches the |
| 15 |
> council in such cases. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> If anything it sounds like PMS might require some updating to be more |
| 18 |
> explicit on the handling of such cases if there is uncertainty on how to |
| 19 |
> interpret it. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> > Let's make Portage comply with the spec instead. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> That seems like a good idea in any case :) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I see no reason to make Portage less strict than it is now. There is no |
| 27 |
valid use case for this, and the PMS behavior is just plain stupid. |
| 28 |
Reverting the change will not bring any clear gain, and will only |
| 29 |
surprise people who actually hit the case. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Best regards, |
| 33 |
Michał Górny |
Archives