1 |
Dnia 2014-07-31, o godz. 11:36:51 |
2 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@×××××.com> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hello, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:48:53 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
7 |
> > On 30/07/14 13:44, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
8 |
> > > Please carefully consider this matter. Having a dedicated group is |
9 |
> > > quite convenient to limit users from using games on workstations |
10 |
> > > and is also handy as a parental control feature. Of course, a |
11 |
> > > dedicated group is not an ultimate solution and can be evaded by |
12 |
> > > technically skilled users, but it nevertheless helps. |
13 |
> > If you need to limit users from using games on a workstation, something |
14 |
> > is wrong somewhere else. As for parental control -- it makes no sense. |
15 |
> > They can install games locally for their own user, |
16 |
> |
17 |
> On noexec partinion for /home and user temp dirs it will be not |
18 |
> possible to run them. |
19 |
|
20 |
...which doesn't help with scripting languages like Python or bash. |
21 |
|
22 |
> > and they can still |
23 |
> > look at whatever you don't want them to look at using the WWW; and they |
24 |
> > can also watch films you do not want them to watch, listen to music you |
25 |
> > object to, or read books you disagree with. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > Restricting access to games, or indeed films, music, books or other |
28 |
> > things, is not a problem I think we should be concerned about. It's |
29 |
> > much too difficult to get right, and in my opinion completely |
30 |
> > pointless and stupid. If you want to censor your children's access to |
31 |
> > creative outlets -- do it yourself on your own computer, instead of |
32 |
> > tasking us with the job. We are not nannies. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> It looks like my reasoning wrong was misunderstood a bit. ATM I'm |
35 |
> not personally interested in these features, but I find them useful |
36 |
> in some practical use cases. And looks like I'm not alone here, |
37 |
> because these features were introduced long time ago and for a |
38 |
> reason. |
39 |
|
40 |
This is not an argument. Many things were introduced long time ago for |
41 |
a reason, sometimes because someone made something up. And then they are |
42 |
kept for a long time for another reason called stubbornness. |
43 |
|
44 |
> I just want to point out that current games policy have not |
45 |
> only cons, but also pros. And code to support this policy is |
46 |
> already here (while it may be buggy, portage itself is quite buggy). |
47 |
|
48 |
The problem is that the cons outweight the pros, and the pros may be |
49 |
used by a few users while the cons affect everyone. |
50 |
|
51 |
> And please do not refer to "other distros", because Gentoo is very |
52 |
> different by its nature from majority of distros. |
53 |
|
54 |
Without specifics, this is meaningless. There's no well-defined |
55 |
'nature' of Gentoo, nor I have any idea how the differences apply to |
56 |
this specific case. |
57 |
|
58 |
That said, cross-distribution compatibility is important. If Gentoo |
59 |
diverges from other distributions, it breeds packages that don't work |
60 |
properly with other distributions and this is exactly the opposite of |
61 |
what programmers using Gentoo expect. |
62 |
|
63 |
-- |
64 |
Best regards, |
65 |
Michał Górny |