1 |
On Jun 16, 2013 9:52 PM, "hasufell" <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
|
4 |
--snip-- |
5 |
|
6 |
> |
7 |
> Doing it via regular useflags is just wrong. |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
I'm sorry, but what's wrong with using USE flags? |
11 |
|
12 |
I mean, some people have already been using USE="-*" because they don't |
13 |
want portage to emerge something they don't want (of course, doing so ends |
14 |
up in lots of teeth-gnashing, but that's beside the point). |
15 |
|
16 |
I myself perused for whatever USE flags there is and manually disable |
17 |
everything I don't want to get installed. Like, USE="-docs -examples" |
18 |
|
19 |
So why not specify one or more additional USE flags which are by default |
20 |
enabled, e.g., "openrc" and "systemd"; user not disabling them will get the |
21 |
whole enchiladas. Yes, users disabling both of them (e.g., "-*") will end |
22 |
up with a totally borked system, but that's the price one pays for |
23 |
specifying "-*", and if a News item is pushed waay before we implement |
24 |
these init-system-related flags, there should be much fewer caught |
25 |
unaware... |
26 |
|
27 |
Rgds, |
28 |
-- |