Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Introducing an optional files directory in the Portage tree with an embedded install condition and individual maintainers. (was Re: [gentoo-project] Proposal for add-on file utility (run after emerge update))
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:35:46
Message-Id: 20130616203303.12eb4f55@TOMWIJ-GENTOO
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Introducing an optional files directory in the Portage tree with an embedded install condition and individual maintainers. (was Re: [gentoo-project] Proposal for add-on file utility (run after emerge update)) by hasufell
1 On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:20:53 +0200
2 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 06/16/2013 08:12 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
5 > > On Jun 16, 2013 9:52 PM, "hasufell" <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
6 > >>
7 > >
8 > > --snip--
9 > >
10 > >>
11 > >> Doing it via regular useflags is just wrong.
12 > >>
13 > >
14 > > I'm sorry, but what's wrong with using USE flags?
15 > >
16 >
17 > Use flags trigger rebuilds. Rebuild libreoffice for a doc useflag?
18 > Have fun.
19
20 If you introduce a separate set of USE flags that only reinstall the
21 optional files and don't touch the rest, you don't have this problem.
22
23 --
24 With kind regards,
25
26 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
27 Gentoo Developer
28
29 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
30 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
31 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature