1 |
On 14-08-2011 07:52:25 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > On 08/14/2011 12:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
4 |
> >> That way you give the regular 1 year term to someone who |
5 |
> >> does his/her job, but allow to intervene directly as needed (and not |
6 |
> >> after 6 months). |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> > This requires dedicated resources, meaning having people monitor the |
9 |
> > activity of these teams and report problems/progress. Even if we enforce |
10 |
> > elections every 6 months, if leaders/teams were active, it is highly |
11 |
> > likely to retain their positions so no harm can come out of that :). |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I think that a forced re-appointment every six months is going to |
14 |
> create a lot more work than just keeping an eye on things. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> And I don't think that anybody is proposing a very heavy level of |
17 |
> monitoring here. Monitoring just means making sure that people aren't |
18 |
> running around with torches and pitchforks calling for the Devrel |
19 |
> lead's head. |
20 |
|
21 |
Exactly. The Council should be looking more at the community as a whole |
22 |
as normal members anyway, so if there is a problem, it'll be noticed |
23 |
quite easily without much extra -- if any -- investments. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Fabian Groffen |
28 |
Gentoo on a different level |