1 |
On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 12:10 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:36:30PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 10:18 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
4 |
> > > Since comrel is a special TLP like QA, I think the comrel lead, like |
5 |
> > > the qa lead, should be confirmed by the council. |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > You may also want to have a GLEP for ComRel like GLEP 48 is for QA. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> This is a good idea; I will write one. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> ... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > > To promote more transparency with comrel, I would like to |
15 |
> > > require the comrel lead to send a report to the gentoo-project list monthly |
16 |
> > > containing these statistics for the previous month: |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > - number of bugs received |
19 |
> > > - number of bugs pending (this is for bugs that are currently in process) |
20 |
> > > - number of bugs resolved by actions (such as talking to |
21 |
> > > developers or disciplinary action) |
22 |
> > > - number of bugs closed without action |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Not sure if you wouldn't need more split, e.g. between requests rejected |
25 |
> > as invalid, withdrawn or timed out. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> There's not a timed out or invalid status for comrel that I'm aware of, |
28 |
> but withdrawn might be good. |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
What if ComRel decides that there are no grounds for the complaint made? |
32 |
Or do you consider this equivalent to resolved? |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Best regards, |
37 |
Michał Górny |