1 |
On 31 July 2013 11:18, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:50 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 07/31/2013 01:46 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> We're not Debian, and that is a good thing™. |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> You miss the point. This thread is not about banning ebuilds which let |
9 |
>> you install unfree software. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> You're thinking of gNewSense, or one of the 47 distros on the FSF |
13 |
> webpage that nobody has heard about. :) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I won't throw in my own two sense. Personally, I'm on the fence here. |
16 |
> I think this is a matter of values and largely boils down to ESR vs |
17 |
> RMS to some extent. I would say that those who want to make a change |
18 |
> probably have the burden of justifying the change. You don't need to |
19 |
> explain your rationale - you've already done a great job with that. I |
20 |
> think the bigger hurdle is whether the community buys in, though this |
21 |
> will only impact new users. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> If there were some easy way to take a poll it might be interesting to |
24 |
> see the results. Dare I suggest a forum post? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> To be constructive, I think I'll try building a desktop in a VM and |
27 |
> just see what the day-to-day impact of your proposal actually is. |
28 |
> Nvidia drivers really only come to mind as the biggest stumbling block |
29 |
> for most - the days of proprietary codecs and such are mostly behind |
30 |
> us I think. Those who oppose the change might point out specific |
31 |
> "killer apps" that this gets in the way of. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Rich |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
I think the biggest hurdle for most users will not be nVidia drivers |
37 |
or anything like that, but firmware. Be it for audio cards, ethernet |
38 |
cards, wifi cards or whatnot. Not to mention, the kernel, with -deblob |
39 |
is under the freedist license which is not in the @FREE group. |