Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 16:06:00
Message-Id: 21304.16604.874627.834786@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08 by Rich Freeman
1 >>>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Rich Freeman wrote:
2
3 > Proposal 2
4 > "Whenever practical developers are required to use unit prefixes
5 > defined in IEC 80000-13 (KB, KiB, etc) so that output is unambiguous.
6 > This does not require maintainers to patch upstream code to change its
7 > behavior, but they should be applied with code that originates in
8 > Gentoo."
9
10 > This takes no stance on whether 1000 vs 1024 is preferred but still
11 > requires the new-style prefixes to remove ambiguity. I strongly
12 > advocate that using "KB" to refer to 1024 bytes is a recipe for
13 > confusion, if only because everybody who attends a decent school comes
14 > out indoctrinated that kilo means something else.
15
16 +1
17
18 (Should be lower case k for kilo though, i.e. "kB" for 1000 bytes and
19 "KiB" for 1024 bytes.)
20
21 Ulrich