Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:51:12
Message-Id: 20110805105054.GL81662@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years by Donnie Berkholz
On 05-08-2011 00:51:51 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I think we have to agree to disagree on this one. The corporate norm > > of checks and balances is to have applications for expenditure, be it > > for trivial sums or large capital items, to be signed off by > > someone/some group with no interest in the outcome, so they can make > > an objective decision. > > > > e.g. I can sign off travel and expenses for others but not for myself. > > At least in my experience, each division would receive its own budget > with independent spending authority. This is subject to auditing but > only in retrospect, not prior to the expense taking place.
Do you suggest the Council should have money to spend? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Replies