1 |
On 05-08-2011 00:51:51 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> > I think we have to agree to disagree on this one. The corporate norm |
3 |
> > of checks and balances is to have applications for expenditure, be it |
4 |
> > for trivial sums or large capital items, to be signed off by |
5 |
> > someone/some group with no interest in the outcome, so they can make |
6 |
> > an objective decision. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > e.g. I can sign off travel and expenses for others but not for myself. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> At least in my experience, each division would receive its own budget |
11 |
> with independent spending authority. This is subject to auditing but |
12 |
> only in retrospect, not prior to the expense taking place. |
13 |
|
14 |
Do you suggest the Council should have money to spend? |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Fabian Groffen |
19 |
Gentoo on a different level |