1 |
On 13/11/16 01:54, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
2 |
> On 11/13/2016 02:53 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>>> With respect, Kristian, I really don't believe we have a problem with |
5 |
>>>> technical matters ... ;] |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>> The description above is a normative description of how things works in |
8 |
>>> the general case, which doesn't involve comrel. The latter is only |
9 |
>>> involved when the usual dispute resolution is not applicable due to |
10 |
>>> personnel making technical issues personal. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>> Ok so for the sake of clarity, we have a purely technical issue, which |
13 |
>> is either right or wrong .. and then someone takes it as a personal |
14 |
>> affront, instead of being mature and professional, and accepting the |
15 |
>> correction, learning the lesson, to put into practise in future. So |
16 |
>> instead of the issue being purely technical .. said person MAKES it |
17 |
>> personal .. and therefore themselves causes a conflict .. which requires |
18 |
>> some form of Discipline .. which breeds hate .. and ... |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> .. you see where I'm going .. ?! |
21 |
>> |
22 |
> At which point ComRel is the applicable body |
23 |
> |
24 |
And this is where I think we are all going wrong ........ it should |
25 |
indeed never *ever* reach that point. Are we not all agreed on that |
26 |
point maybe??? |