| 1 |
On 04/22/2010 11:27 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I read your proposal as giving unlimited powers to the council without |
| 4 |
> some form of check and balances. I gather from your last reply that you |
| 5 |
> want to ensure they have enough leeway to be able to act, but that they |
| 6 |
> should only do it in extreme cases. It seems there's room to try to find |
| 7 |
> a balance. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I think we're on the same page here. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> You have a point as I haven't submitted any alternative yet. I do want |
| 12 |
> to submit a proposal but I'm still thinking about it and evaluating old |
| 13 |
> thoughts about Gentoo's meta-structure. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Looking forward to it. Perhaps you'll find such a balance. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I also agree with Roy's assessment that if push came to shove things may |
| 18 |
have to change, although honestly the status quo works well enough that |
| 19 |
I'm not sure I'd drive that change unless necessary. I think that was |
| 20 |
what Roy was trying to suggest as well. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives