| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:12:32PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 4 |
> Quite a few of you know that Council acts as a court in case a developer |
| 5 |
> has unresolved disputes with Devrel or when he is not happy with a |
| 6 |
> Devrel's decision. The problem is that having the same people in the |
| 7 |
> Council and in Devrel makes no sense since the same people will vote |
| 8 |
> twice on that matter. A developer who wants to appeal to Council, seeks |
| 9 |
> a review of his case and a fresh voting from new people. However, having |
| 10 |
> devrel members, which are already biased based on the previous decision, |
| 11 |
> makes the "Council's court role" a moot role :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It definitely does create a conflict of interest. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think there are a couple of ways to handle it: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
1) don't allow council members to be in devrel, or |
| 18 |
2) don't allow council members who are also in devrel to vote in |
| 19 |
appeals. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
What does everyone think? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
William |
Archives