Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-06-12
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:03:04
Message-Id: 20426.43332.37753.819773@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-06-12 by Samuli Suominen
>>>>> On Sun, 03 Jun 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Can you indicate what the council has to vote on/decide for this one?
> EAPI=5
> optional: "$@" placement in default for src_configure()
> econf "$@"
> optional: "$@" placement in default for src_compile()
> emake "$@"
I still don't see the point of it. econf or emake could just be called directly. We won't gain anything by allowing arguments, but only complicate things.
> this one is what I'm really after for:
> default for src_install() in EAPI=5 should accept "$@" in correct place > to avoid usage of EXTRA_EMAKE within ebuilds/eclasses and to avoid > duplicating the Portage code for DOCS. > NOTE: When this was last voted on for EAPI=3, we didn't have this DOCS > handling, and this wasn't important yet.
> emake DESTDIR="${D}" "$@" install
Again, this could be called directly, which has the advantage that it makes it obvious that src_install isn't the default. Ulrich

Replies