Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: ssuominen@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] OT - Tinderbox question
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:01:51
Message-Id: 20140516150125.590d9ca6@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] OT - Tinderbox question by Samuli Suominen
1 On Fri, 16 May 2014 15:31:33 +0300
2 Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
3
4 >
5 > On 15/05/14 20:17, Rich Freeman wrote:
6 > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:21 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
7 > > wrote:
8 > >> Sergey Popov:
9 > >>> And yes, we need tinderbox. But, c'mon. stop talking loudly on ML
10 > >>> and get things done if you can.
11 > >>>
12 > >> This is like working on patches while upstream already said "not
13 > >> interested".
14 > >>
15 > >> Since QA doesn't think it's their job to run a tinderbox, I will
16 > >> work with those people who actually care about it, instead of QA.
17 > > Perhaps you should let QA speak for what it thinks its job is? Note
18 > > that random posts in random bugs by random members of QA isn't the
19 > > same as QA saying something.
20 >
21 > Except it is, that's what QA just voted in their own meeting,
22 > one QA member represents the whole team.
23
24 No, GLEP 48 does not state that.
25
26 --
27 With kind regards,
28
29 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
30 Gentoo Developer
31
32 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
33 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
34 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature