| 1 |
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 2 |
<chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Enforcement of CoC will be proactive, not reactive[0,1]. This in my |
| 4 |
> understanding means that devrel will not wait for reports of CoC |
| 5 |
> violations. Instead, they or their assistants will be policing mailing |
| 6 |
> lists and bugzilla[2] for infractions, and make an example of the first |
| 7 |
> developer who transgresses the CoC[3]. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Bannable offenses will not be limited to direct personal insults, but also |
| 10 |
> include trolling, being judgmental[4], labeling proposals or software as |
| 11 |
> "crap"[5], saying things that could be seen as offensive in certain |
| 12 |
> cultures or to people with certain personality traits[6], as well as making |
| 13 |
> non-constructive statements[7]. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> To me this is a very grim picture. If hope it is not accurate, but if it is |
| 16 |
> I hereby speak out against this. I'd like to see any emergency action |
| 17 |
> limited to response to personal attacks and insults, and any stricter rules |
| 18 |
> set only in place after Council decision. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Frankly, I think it sounds great. I believe Markos already said that |
| 21 |
outright bans are going to be based on patterns of behavior and |
| 22 |
disregarding of warnings. I think that seems perfectly reasonable. |
| 23 |
I'm content to wait and see how things turn out. I'm sure that |
| 24 |
they'll use progressively more discretion as offenses become less |
| 25 |
drastic. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Rich |
Archives