1 |
On 03-08-2011 11:09:07 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> > > 1. Include all commits, don't retroactively change existing ChangeLog |
3 |
> > > messages |
4 |
> > > |
5 |
> > > 2. Allow commit filtering, don't retroactively change existing ChangeLog |
6 |
> > > messages |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > - Filters to allow: keywording, stabilization, removal of ebuilds. |
9 |
> > > Whoever implements the code can decide on the format of said filters. |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > Do any council members feel strongly that we should include additional |
13 |
> > > options, or is it good enough to just make a choice on these two? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > I listed the questions I think are relevant at the bottom of my mail. I |
16 |
> > feel you forgot the most important one: should ChangeLogs be |
17 |
> > auto-generated at all?. Only if yes, |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Yeah, that's already on my draft agenda [1]. =) But we should still have |
20 |
> a small set of options to choose from if we do vote to automate, so we |
21 |
> don't sit around for another month or discuss it aimlessly for hours. |
22 |
> Being prepared is what I'm hoping we can do here. |
23 |
|
24 |
Ok, then I suggest simply adding ", don't bother about changes between |
25 |
CVS log and ChangeLog" to both of your options. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Fabian Groffen |
30 |
Gentoo on a different level |