Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o>
To: "René 'Necoro' Neumann" <lists@××××××.eu>
Cc: Alec Warner <antarus@×××××××××××.com>, gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Automation: Making package.mask better
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:43:24
Message-Id: 4E9466B4-6D52-4ABA-813B-EA081D923AB4@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Automation: Making package.mask better by "René 'Necoro' Neumann"
1 Am 23.07.2007 um 07:25 schrieb René 'Necoro' Neumann:
2 > Alec Warner schrieb:
3 >>> It has been a proposal only ... :) As I thought that automatic
4 >>> parsing
5 >>> of arbitrary textfiles is an ugly thing to do ... But if you like
6 >>> this
7 >>> more *shrug* do it ^^
8 >>>
9 >>> - - Nec
10 >>
11 >> And the alternative to parsing arbitrary text files is? Why do you
12 >> think it's ugly?
13 >>
14 >> -Alec
15 >>
16 >
17 > It is ugly, because you have to write an (error prone) parser by
18 > yourself instead of using a generic one (for XML, sexps or whatever).
19 > And it is easier to format the file in a wrong way and thus leading to
20 > sth unwanted ...
21 >
22 > But I don't think, this discussion leads somewhere ... (sorry that I
23 > brought that topic at all). In the end it's the decision of the
24 > poor guy
25 > who has to do the work :)
26
27 It's not a bad thing to do a proposal, I just don't think
28 breaking compatibility is worth it.
29
30 Btw, Alec: Are you sure you are subscribed here with your
31 scriptkitty address? Because I did not receive your last two mails
32 quoted by René over this list.
33
34 Robert
35
36 --
37 gentoo-project@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Automation: Making package.mask better Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>