1 |
On 03-08-2011 19:16:15 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> > I listed the questions I think are relevant at the bottom of my mail. |
3 |
> > I feel you forgot the most important one: should ChangeLogs be |
4 |
> > auto-generated at all?. Only if yes, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I am a bit confused. I though that the previous council had already |
7 |
> approved the automated changelog generation[1] |
8 |
> |
9 |
> [1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110608-summary.txt |
10 |
|
11 |
The above link references the original thread on auto-generation of |
12 |
ChangeLogs, but it doesn't decide on anything at all about it. The |
13 |
discussion was mainly focussed on policies and temporary workarounds. |
14 |
|
15 |
The topic as it is presented in the original thread is about what |
16 |
choices to make when generating, which greatly influences the efforts it |
17 |
needs to be implemented. |
18 |
|
19 |
I hope it will allow us to perhaps even start auto-generating ChangeLogs |
20 |
today, that is, right now, and not just only when we switch to the next |
21 |
VCS. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Fabian Groffen |
26 |
Gentoo on a different level |