Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Manuel Rüger" <mrueg@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 21:15:20
Message-Id: e4cfa58d-b0e4-51d7-a9f8-d483747e4fed@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29 by "Michał Górny"
1 On 14.07.2018 22:50, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > W dniu sob, 14.07.2018 o godzinie 14∶29 -0500, użytkownik Matthew Thode
3 > napisał:
4 >> On 18-07-14 21:10:11, Michał Górny wrote:
5 >>> W dniu sob, 14.07.2018 o godzinie 18∶21 +0200, użytkownik Manuel Rüger
6 >>> napisał:
7 >>>> On 13.07.2018 10:37, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
8 >>>>> In two weeks from now, the newly elected council will have its first
9 >>>>> meeting. This is the time to raise and prepare items that the council
10 >>>>> should put on the agenda to discuss or vote on.
11 >>>>>
12 >>>>> Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate
13 >>>>> to repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously
14 >>>>> suggested one (since the last meeting).
15 >>>>>
16 >>>>> The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on Sunday 2018-07-22.
17 >>>>>
18 >>>>> Please reply to the gentoo-project list.
19 >>>>>
20 >>>>> Ulrich
21 >>>>>
22 >>>>
23 >>>> As the council represents the Gentoo Developer community, the council
24 >>>> members should behave as role models for this community.
25 >>>>
26 >>>> I would like each council member to explicitly state their agreement to
27 >>>> our Code of Conduct.
28 >>>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Code_of_conduct
29 >>>
30 >>> The request for the new Council members to reiterate their
31 >>> acknowledgement of Code of Conduct -- which they obviously implicitly
32 >>> agreed to -- sounds like a serious implicit accusation. Isn't making
33 >>> such an accusation a violation of Code of Conduct itself though?
34 >>>
35 >>
36 >> I don't think of it as an accusation, more of a 'swearing in' as they
37 >> are moving into a new office.
38 >>
39 >
40 > Having more context to this than you do, I think it's an elaborate
41 > scheme of petty vengeance. Thus, it's doubly offensive since Council is
42 > being used here as a tool to developer's private vendetta.
43 >
44
45 Michał, I kindly and strongly advise to re-read the CoC and stop
46 purveying misinformation. Let us return to a culture of mutual respect.
47
48 Thanks,
49 Manuel

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature