| 1 |
В Пнд, 31/10/2011 в 09:14 +0100, Michał Górny пишет: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:43:49 +0400 |
| 3 |
> Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > В Срд, 26/10/2011 в 18:35 +0200, Michał Górny пишет: |
| 6 |
> > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +0200 |
| 7 |
> > > Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > > > In less than two weeks, the council will meet again. This is the |
| 10 |
> > > > time to raise and prepare items that the council should put on |
| 11 |
> > > > the agenda to vote on. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > As an extension of ChangeLog topic, I'd like to suggest to require |
| 14 |
> > > developers to commit packages with matching (same) ChangeLog entries |
| 15 |
> > > and commit messages. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > I don't see how this logic may work in case you need to modify |
| 18 |
> > Changelog, so ... wontfix :) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> 'Need' is a very bad word here. I'd rather use 'have a wannabe'. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
We have and use this feature now so... better word should be "must" |
| 23 |
until somebody provides very valid reasons to drop it. Speaking about |
| 24 |
your reasons: |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> 1) easier migration to autogenerated ChangeLogs if we want that at |
| 27 |
> some point, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Still questionable need. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> 2) better availability of the information (right now, looking up |
| 32 |
> changes sometimes involves checking both CVS log and ChangeLog message |
| 33 |
> to see what actually happened), |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Was discussed many times with the resolution: they should be different. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> 3) one step towards preventing useless ChangeLog entries. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
In the spirit of Gentoo to fix this issue we just need to improve our |
| 40 |
tools and the first step, moving echangelog into repoman, is already |
| 41 |
done: |
| 42 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337853 |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
With best regards, |
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
Peter. |
Archives