| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:33AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01-08-2011 23:24:56 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 3 |
> > As I've expressed already a few times, I strongly disagree with the |
| 4 |
> > Council being able to change the rules that govern it. In my view, this |
| 5 |
> > topic belongs to a reform of GLEP39. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Also, as documented on the last meeting's summary[1], the current |
| 8 |
> > council voted on not being able to update GLEP39: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Donnie asked for a clarification by the council members on whether they |
| 11 |
> > think a global dev vote is required to update GLEP39 or not. The |
| 12 |
> > council voted 5 yes and 1 no that the council can't change GLEP39 as it |
| 13 |
> > requires a full developer vote. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > [1] - |
| 16 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110715-summary.txt |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Right, which means to me that if the council agrees on a certain change |
| 19 |
> to GLEP39, it has to organise a full developer vote with all the |
| 20 |
> supporting material for the change. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
But, you are saying that the council has to approve changes for glep |
| 23 |
39 before they can come to a vote. This would mean that say a majority |
| 24 |
of developers doesn't like something in glep 39, but the council |
| 25 |
doesn't approve the change. That change will never come to a vote. In |
| 26 |
other words, the council has control of the rules that govern it. Is |
| 27 |
that what you are intending? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
William |
Archives