Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:55:33
Message-Id: 4E3BF61F.7050300@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years by Fabian Groffen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 08/05/2011 02:44 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
5 > On 05-08-2011 14:17:29 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
6 >> I am still not convinced that a committee of 7 people is flexible
7 >> enough to push radical changes.
8 >
9 > Perhaps I misunderstand you here, but I don't think making radical
10 > changes is good, that's what 7 people balance out. Radical changes
11 > have been made to important parts of Gentoo like e.g. Python, and
12 > this didn't really result in a major improvement, IMO.
13
14 My point is how fast and how flexible can a committee like this decide
15 on global project issues
16
17 >
18 >> Maybe they are but they need to spend enough time talking about
19 >> things before meetings. Does everyone has the time to spend so many
20 >> hours on mailing lists? See how many discussions end up to
21 >> /dev/null or just forgotten after a while.
22 >
23 > Being a council member means you have to deal with it. I don't
24 > think you get the red button for free, you're supposed to do some
25 > good homework for it.
26 >
27 > When discussions die, probably this is because noone could come up
28 > with a clear enough problem, and directed discussion to come to some
29 > conclusions. Controversial topics of course always have proponents
30 > and opponents, but just deciding to go left or right doesn't
31 > necessarily help to improve the situation. It just makes some happy
32 > and others angry.
33 >
34 >
35 Right nobody came with a proper solution yet the problems still exists.
36 The same problem will probably pop up again in the future, recycling the
37 previous discussion and go back to sleep again. Someone has to decide
38 and vote for the least worst solution before the problem goes back to
39 hibernation, otherwise you are back to square 0. This is no progress
40
41 - --
42 Regards,
43 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
44 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
45 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
46
47 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOO/YfAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LC12cP/jMQOY+kbkW/crTQB5BkvXyN
48 PJN27oDgEJpmh4CyOt/yixhoPwzmngwPIn3BOWzrsLXS9DWYKC9X1aZnfM7wYKTD
49 cPbd+iE0y9dG7ItDPti81DUh2hocBPanpm/FHjZp9fpBoTrORi7hp9EB0Tw4cIe/
50 Gfhgo1+4Fgt7PgRpXcuOhJl+jvgBD2BpiapSS1urx2KX5FeVsXXDLotkB2+z47Ez
51 HawKUt7Rc5HDbzMaIjq6vQLqbCkdTIpdmtm8Bku5MEIeYCjEyRSm/+eUdpWO62+K
52 UdWIYa1GyxIxduL+RKIkm2Eg7R5lPqoXlgEp5Pi1hWAX3+/fcyhOecbSIAxG1XJt
53 5SDFA18s1VF7jk1o03t3v5zZ/pwNz+G8R1ULGVyV64ttxxRiuMhdh6V23A7YxTyE
54 PLlAimtmkoSNb0D3BdzNIj9eaTsTW2oFco5h96GnXQVDHE3rJZFSPoNAhyElC4tj
55 ioXDPkUw8x9Us1r9ZwG70Noj8litSXDAf5Sk1uuBCy9z/629jVBXKp5yBONoYjsS
56 7JHymvoO8KKL7AubdsT0FysYOUuxE9nakUU2YzPUXFpOmLXyb+bcSBmNqG85rUlL
57 P1TYx0sas3KX1IFqh40C1uk5PMHQOGZqLvNCYUuLG+NZmaDQ9plXWpEnEF2NtDnr
58 TphVM8FcMuiRRhRYAltq
59 =T54Z
60 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies