Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-05-08
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:04:39
Message-Id: 4F99CA4B.6000401@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-05-08 by Roy Bamford
Roy Bamford wrote:

> Council involvement is only useful where there is a choice to be made > between alternatives and the proponents of the options can't agree. > In the udev case, there is as yet, no viable alternative, so the option > is take it or leave it. > > Gentoo may wish to support separate /usr without an initrd but until > the code base allows it, there is nothing for the council to vote on.
What did they vote on during the last meeting then? Just curious. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"