| 1 |
Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
> Steve Long wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > Steve Long wrote: |
| 5 |
>> >> > Have a look at, for example, [1], where Mike already gave you an |
| 6 |
>> >> > answer one of the previous times we discussed it. |
| 7 |
>> >> > |
| 8 |
>> >> I'm aware of the prior discussion. |
| 9 |
>> >> Re-read it, and tell me what it breaks, if you can. |
| 10 |
>> > |
| 11 |
>> > Well, which part of the previous times it's been explained to you |
| 12 |
>> > didn't you understand? |
| 13 |
>> > |
| 14 |
>> No one has ever given me a technical reason. I thought you might have |
| 15 |
>> light to shed; clearly not. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Please don't reply to my posts if you don't have any actual |
| 18 |
>> information to add; I realise you like long fruitless mail |
| 19 |
>> 'discussions', and apparently have lots of time for them, but I |
| 20 |
>> don't, and I don't enjoy reading them either. This kind of one-liner |
| 21 |
>> with zero content, and no intent but to insult, should simply be |
| 22 |
>> binned without sending imo. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Okay, Steve, stop. I don't think you realize it, but you are trolling |
| 25 |
> this list. |
| 26 |
That wasn't my intention; I added that comment simply to stop the flow of |
| 27 |
one-line emails. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> Every second post is you and Ciaran bitching at each other |
| 30 |
I do wish one of you devs would pick him up on his behaviour _on the list_ |
| 31 |
one of these days.. instead it's _always_ me who gets the flak. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Or do you think his post was anything other than a "one-liner with zero |
| 34 |
content, and no intent but to insult"? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> or you complaining about every single thing we do that you |
| 37 |
> don't personally like. |
| 38 |
Not complaining, simply pointing out better ways to do things; a technical |
| 39 |
discussion iow. The reason that has been more difficult a discussion than |
| 40 |
it should be is because of the unpleasant comments from McCreesh, Ferdy and |
| 41 |
Leverton. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
> We appreciate your input, but please respect our |
| 44 |
> right to do things the way we think is best for us, even if they aren't |
| 45 |
> aligned to your personal preferences. |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
I was never under the impression that Gentoo devs would do anything other |
| 48 |
than whatever they wanted. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Can you tell me what a 'server' USE flag _breaks_? |
Archives