Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-project] Reply to setting Was: Improving developer/user communication]
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 06:42:07
Message-Id: 20070721074153.0591a5f5@zaphod.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-project] Reply to setting Was: Improving developer/user communication] by Kumba
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:47:42 -0400, Kumba wrote:

> This is actually quite similar to some of the top-level MLs I'm on, > namely linux-mips. It's designed so you can exclude the ML from a > chain if you need to take a topic to private convo with a related > party.
You can do that anyway, with Reply to Sender. Since the whole point of a list like this is for open discussion, the default should be for replies to go to the list. It is different for, say, an announce list. The other Gentoo discussion lists have Reply-To set so omitting it from here seems more like an omission than policy. -- Neil Bothwick An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure, and has a lower TCO, than linux.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies